Ravindra Mandal @ Ravindra Kumar And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.10703 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-259 Year-2018 Thana- DHAMDAHA District- Purnia ======================================================

1. RAVINDRA MANDAL @ RAVINDRA KUMAR Son of Naresh Mandal Resident of Village - Amari Kukroun, P.S.- Dhamdaha, District- Purnea

2. Jittan Mandal Son of Shiv Narayan Mandal Resident of Village - Amari Kukroun,P.S. Dhamdaha, District Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Dr. Bidhu Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 22-02-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 147,149,341, 342, 353, and 504 IPC registered in connection with Dhamdaha P.S. Case No. 259 of 2018.

3. It is submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated and the accusations are general and omnibus in nature without any specific overt act attributed to the petitioners. The FIR has been instituted against as many as 14 named accused, 8-10 unknown persons and 10-12 women. The petitioners claim clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioners arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Purnea, in connection with Dhamdaha P.S. Case No. 259 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. and also subject to the following further conditions:

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.10703 of 2019(2) dt.22-02-2019 2/2 i. That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioners. ii. That the petitioners shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

iii. That the petitioners shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make themselves available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

iv. The petitioners shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/- U T