Nageshwar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.3122 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -167 Year- 2012 Thana -NABINAGAR District- AURANGABAD ====================================================== Nageshwar Singh, Son of Late Janki Singh, Resident of Village- Ratan Karma, P.S. Nabinagar, District- Aurangabad (Bihar). .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajballabh Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 07-02-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner is accused in connection with Nabinagar P.S. Case No. 167 of 2012, registered under Sections 364/302 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act and Section 17 of C.L.A. Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. In course of investigation, the name of the petitioner has surfaced in the confessional statement of co-accused Dhananjay Kumar Singh and Shankar Yadav, except the confessional statement there is no material against the petitioners to show the hands of the petitioners in the present case. Further submission is that, in fact, the petitioners are accused in 9 other cases due to that reasons, the Police

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3122 of 2017 (2) dt.07-02-2017 2/2 implicated the petitioners in this case only on the basis of confessional statements of co-accused Dhananjay Kumar Singh and Shankar Yadav.

Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioners, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in connection with Nabinagar P.S. Case No. 167 of 2012. Out of two sureties, one surety must be the close relative of the petitioners, who will file an affidavit showing his relation with the petitioners.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) manish/- U T