← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./2809/2017bail granted

Vikash Kumar @ Vikash Chaudhary And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

2017-02-09Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.2809 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -111 Year- 2016 Thana -TARIYANI CHOWK District- SHEOHAR ======================================================

1. Vikash Kumar @ Vikash Chaudhary Son of Ram Jinish Chaudhary

2. Jitendra Sahni @ Jaggo Son of Shambhu Sahni Both are residents of village - Narwara, Police Station - Tariyani, District - Sheohar. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. M. Verma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ram Priya Saran Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 09-02-2017 The petitioners seek regular bail in connection with Tariyani P.S. Case No. 111 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Section 387 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners names have surfaced in this case only on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused and except that there is nothing against them and they are in custody since 01.10.2016. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the fact that petitioners' name transpired on this case only on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused and except that there is nothing against the petitioners, let the petitioners above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2809 of 2017 (2) dt.09-02-2017 2/2 Twenty Five) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sheohar, in connection with Tariyani P.S. Case No. 111 of 2016, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioners will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioners will cooperate in the disposal of trial and make themselves available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on their part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of their bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T