Shiv Bandhu Paswan @ Sambandhu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11413 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-152 Year-2024 Thana- KONCH District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

Shiv Bandhu Paswan @ sambandhu Kumar S/O Yogeshwar Paswan Residents of village Bahabchak, police station Konch,District- Gaya. 2.

Manish Kumar Son of Yogeshwar Paswan Residents of village Bahabchak, police station Konch,District- Gaya.

3.

Tanish Kumar S/O Yogeshwar Paswan Residents of village Bahabchak, police station Konch,District- Gaya.

4.

Asha Devi wife of Pintu Paswan @ Pintu Kumar Residents of village Bahabchak, police station Konch,District- Gaya. 5.

Ashapati Devi Wife of Yogeshwar Paswan Residents of village Bahabchak, police station Konch,District- Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vishwa Ranjan Choudhary For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anuj Kumar Shrivastava ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 20-03-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Konch P.S. Case No. 152 of 2024, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 354, 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The prosecution case in brief is that the petitioners

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11413 of 2025(2) dt.20-03-2025 2/3 and other accused persons are alleged to have entered the house of the informant and tried to outrage her modesty and when her husband came to rescue her all the accused persons assaulted him due to which he sustained head injury. When her daughter came to save her, accused Pintu Kumar assaulted her. It is further alleged that petitioners nos. 4 and 5 snatched jewellery.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. Allegation of assault is vague and omnibus. Doctor has found the injury simple in nature. Parties have compromised their case. Petitioners claim clean antecedent.

5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts of the case and also considering the clean antecedent of the petitioners, the prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed.

7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the petitioners above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court of Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Konch P.S. Case No. 152

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11413 of 2025(2) dt.20-03-2025 3/3 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Indian Penal Code.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Ranjeet/- U T