Kamlesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13394 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-100 Year-2024 Thana- SIMRI District- Buxar ====================================================== Kamlesh Yadav S/o Laxman Yadav R/V - Sahiyar, PS- Simari, Dist- Buxar ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Pramod Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Nawal Kishore Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 28-03-2025 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection with Simri P.S. Case No. 100 of 2024, registered on 16.03.2024, for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 354(B), 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per the prosecution, the FIR has been lodged against four named accused persons including the petitioner against whom there is allegation that all the accused persons, in connivance with each other, have assaulted the informant and her husband due to which they sustained injuries.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Counsel further submits that the petitioner and the informant are agnates.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13394 of 2025(2) dt.28-03-2025 2/2 Additionally, Counsel submits that there is a specific allegation against the present petitioner. Counsel also submits that the petitioner has a pending criminal case, and his criminal antecedents are not clean.
5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that there is direct and specific allegation against the present petitioner that he inflicted a blow with a "daw" on the informant's husband and also tore the blouse of the informant. Counsel further submits that there is one criminal case pending against the petitioner.
6. In the present facts and circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, therefore the bail application of the petitioner is hereby rejected. (Dr. Anshuman, J) Aman Kumar/- U T