Patna High CourtCR. MISC./5452/2017bail granted

Murari Kumar Sharma @ Murari Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

2017-02-08Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.5452 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -171 Year- 2016 Thana -NAUGACHIA District- BHAGALPUR ====================================================== Murari Kumar Sharma @ Murari Sharma Son of Sri Prabhash Sharma Resident of Village- Jhandupur P.S. Bihpur, District- Bhagalpur. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner : Mr. Amrendra Kumar,Advocate For the State : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 08-02-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 05.10.2016 in connection with Naugachia P.S.Case No. 171 of 2016 for the alleged offences under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated on mere suspicion and no recovery of any incriminating articles have been made from his possession. Except his self confession before the police, there is no material to connect the petitioner with the alleged offence. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5452 of 2017 (2) dt.08-02-2017 thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Naugachia in connection with Naugachia P.S. Case No. 171 of 2016 on the following conditions - (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(iv) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/Ibrar U T