Ram Swaroop Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3376 of 2015 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 17731 of 2014 ====================================================== Ram Swaroop Singh, son of Late Girdhari Singh, resident of village- Akair, P.O. Akair, P.S. Chandi, District- Nalanda.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director, Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

4. The District Magistrate, Nalanda.

5. The District Education Officer, Nalanda.

6. The Block Development Officer, Chandi, Nalanda.

7. The Block Education Extension Officer, Chandi-cum-Secretary, Primary Sanskrit School, Sakraurha, P.O. Bhobhi, P.S. Chandi, DistrictNalanda.

8. The Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Patna through its Chairman.

9. The Secretary, Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Patna.

10. The Head Master, Primary School, Sakraurha, P.O. Bhobhi, P.S. Nagarnausa, District- Nalanda.

11. Kumari Shobha Verma, wife of Sri Raj Kumar Verma, resident of village- Sakraurha, P.O. Bhobhi, P.S. Nagarnausa, District- Nalanda.

12. Saneh Lata Kumari, wife of not known, resident of village- Sakraurha, P.O. Bhobhi, P.S. Nagarnausa, District- Nalanda. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Kumar Verma, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anjani Kumar, AAG-6 Mr. Santosh Kumar, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ) 17-12-2015 Heard Mr. Umesh Kumar Verma, learned Counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, and Mr. Anjani Kumar, learned Additional Advocate General-6, appearing on behalf of the State-respondents. Heard also Mr. Santosh Kumar, learned

Patna High Court MJC No.3376 of 2015 (2) dt.17-12-2015 2/2 Counsel for the respondent No.12.

After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to approach this Court with appropriate application in future, if so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.

No objection has been raised to the prayer for withdrawal made by the petitioner.

In view of the above and in the interest of justice, the application is hereby disposed of as withdrawn. (I.A. Ansari, ACJ) (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) K.C.jha/- U