← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./10252/2022bail granted

Gyanendra Kumar @ Gyanendra v. The State Of Bihar

2022-06-15Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10252 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-11 Year-2021 Thana- KALER District- Jehanabad ====================================================== GYANENDRA KUMAR @ GYANENDRA Son of Mahendra Singh Resident of Village- Jaunati, 207 Main Street, North East, P.S.- Kanjhawala, DistrictSonipat (Hariyana). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Nityanand, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dashrath Mehta, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 15-06-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence under Sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

Recovery is of 1848.12 liters of foreign liquor. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the name of the petitioner transpired in this case on the basis of disclosure made by the co-accused, namely Surendra @ Sukha, who is said to be the driver of the vehicle from which alleged recovery has been made. He further submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10252 of 2022(2) dt.15-06-2022 2/3 neither the petitioner was apprehended on the sport nor anything incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. He further submits that the police after investigation has submitted chargesheet in this case against the petitioner. The petitioner is rotting in judicial custody since 22.06.2021. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that the petitioner carries one more case other than the present one. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the, above named, petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Excise Case No. 196 of 2021 arising out of Kaler P.S. Case No. 11 of 2021 with the following conditions:-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be canceled by the Court below.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10252 of 2022(2) dt.15-06-2022 3/3

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(3) One of the bailors shall be the father/wife of the petitioner.

And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) brajesh/- U T