Vickky Verma v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.2864 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -373 Year- 2016 Thana -PHULWARI District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Vickky Verma, Son of Shambhu Verma, Resident of Bibiganj, Danapur, P.S.- Danapur, District- Patna.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kumar Rajeev For the Opposite Party/s : Smt Pushpa Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 10-02-2017 Heard the parties.

This application has been filed in connection with Phulwari P.S.Case No.373 of 2016 for the offence under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is nothing against the petitioner and now the charge-sheet has been submitted and only on the basis of final form, he has been made accused in this case. He has clean antecedent and he is in custody for about six months.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides. In view of the fact that there is no legal evidence against the petitioner and there is nothing against him. He is in custody for about six months, let the petitioner,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2864 of 2017 (2) dt.10-02-2017 2/2 above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Smt. Seema Eram, Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Patna in connection with Phulwari P.S.Case No.373 of 2016.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U