Patna High CourtCR. MISC./8887/2019bail granted

Neeraj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2019-02-25Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.8887 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-43 Year-2018 Thana- SHRIKRISHNAPURI District- Patna ====================================================== NEERAJ KUMAR, Male, aged about 23 years, Son of- Shri Nazir Prasad Resident of Mohall-Akhara Road, Yaduvansi Nagar, P.S. Digha, DistrictPatna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kamlesh Prasad Yadav, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Pawan Kumar Chaurasia (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 25-02-2019 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with S.K. Puri P.S. Case No. 43 of 2018 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 326, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioner has earlier moved this Court for bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 27151 of 2018 which was rejected on 04.09.2018 with a liberty to renew his prayer for bail after completion of one year in custody. Petitioner is in custody since 21.02.2018. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the observation made in order dated 04.09.2018 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 27151 of 2018, petitioner named above

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.8887 of 2019(3) dt.25-02-2019 2/2 be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-X, Patna, in connection with S.K. Puri P.S. Case No. 43 of 2018 with following conditions:

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (S. Kumar, J) Rajiv/- U T