Raju Prasad @ Raju Kumar Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20787 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-324 Year-2020 Thana- BARAULI District- Gopalganj ====================================================== RAJU PRASAD @ RAJU KUMAR PRASAD Son of Prabhu Prasad Resident of Village - Barauli Bazar, P.S.- Barauli, District - Gopalganj. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Prateek Tandon For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.A.G.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 03-12-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks from today.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Barauli P.S. Case No. 324 of 2020 registered for the offence under Section 30 (a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018.

In view of the fact that prima facie case under the Excise Act, is made out against the petitioner, this application for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is not maintainable in view of Full Bench decision of this Court rendered in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav Vs. The State of Bihar reported in 2019

(2) P.L.J.R. 1089 (F.B.).

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20787 of 2021(2) dt.03-12-2021 2/2 Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as not maintainable.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) pravinkumar/- U