Jaggu @ Jagoo Koeiry @ Jagu Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10056 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-183 Year-2019 Thana- BHAGWANPUR District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== JAGGU @ JAGOO KOEIRY @ JAGU RAM Son of Shivmurat Ram Resident of Village - Tiwai, P.S.- Chainpur, District - Kaimur at Bhabua. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajani Kant Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Sumiran Rai ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 01-12-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case in connection with Bhagwanpur P.S. Case No.183 of 2019, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 406/420/379/120-B of the Indian Penal Code.

The prosecution case in short is that the informant has solemnized the marriage of his son with one Sunita Kumari at Mudeshwari temple but soon after marriage the petitioner and other accused persons reached there and asked for money which was given. Thereafter, Sunita

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10056 of 2020(5) dt.01-12-2021 2/3 Kumari fled away with the accused persons.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to local village politics and party band. No such occurrence as alleged ever taken place. The allegation leveled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. It is further submitted that petitioner has no criminal antecedent, as such, he may be enlarged on anticipatory bail.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail by submitting that the petitioner is named in FIR.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner named above.

Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail application is dismissed.

However, the petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from today and seek regular bail.

The learned court below is directed to consider and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10056 of 2020(5) dt.01-12-2021 3/3 dispose of the case of the petitioner, on the same date, in accordance with the merits of the case without being prejudiced by the dismissal of the present application. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) pallavi/- U T