← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/2998/2022disposed

Dr. Balendra Prasad Sinha v. The Union Of India

2024-09-26Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2998 of 2022 ====================================================== Dr. Balendra Prasad Sinha son of Sri Ambika Singh resident of Vivekanand Colony, Sanchipatti, Ward No.- 7, at, P.S. and District Hajipur, Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Union of India Ministry of Railway, through the Chairman, Railway Board, Rail Bhawan, Raiseena Road, New Delhi- 110001. 2.

The Chairman, Railway Board, Rail Bhawan, Raiseena Road, New Delhi110001. 3.

The Zonal Office, E.C. Railway, Hajipur, through its General Manager. 4.

The General Manager, E.C. Railway, Zonal Office, Hajipur. 5.

The Divisional Railway Manager, E.C. Railway, Sonpur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sivendra Kishore, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Saroj Kumar For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Krishna Nandan Singh, ASG Mr. Alok Kumar, CGC ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 26-09-2024 Heard learned Senior counsel for the petitioner and learned Senior counsel for the respondents.

2. At the very outset, learned Senior counsel for the petitioner submits that earlier the petitioner has filed a detailed representation before the Chairman, Railway Board in year 2021, but till date no order has been passed by the concerned authority.

3. Considering the aforesaid facts, the petitioner is directed to file a fresh representation before the respondent no. 2 along with all supporting documents within a period of two

Patna High Court CWJC No.2998 of 2022(5) dt.26-09-2024 2/2 weeks and the respondent no. 2 is well advised to consider the case of the petitioner after affording opportunity of personal hearing or through his counsel and pass a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law within eight weeks thereafter.

4. It is made clear that the respondent no. 2 shall be held liable for non-compliance of this order within the stipulated period.

5. With the aforesaid direction, the writ application stands disposed of.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) anand/- U