Mahavir Paswan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.10210 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -145 Year- 2016 Thana -BARGANIA District- SITAMARHI ====================================================== Mahavir Paswan, Son of Late Ramdeo Paswan, Resident of VillageJamua, Police Station- Bairgania, District- Sitamarhi. .... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ahmad Ali, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 06-03-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
This is an application for bail in connection with Bairagania P.S.Case No. 145 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 47(a) and 53 of the Bihar Excise (Amendment) Act, 2016.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he has remained in custody for about six months and there is alleged recovery of 15.600 litres of Nepali wine.
Heard learned APP also.
Having heard both sides and considering the fact that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and has remained in custody for about six months, let the petitioner, above named, be released
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.10210 of 2017 (2) dt.06-03-2017 2/2 on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi, in connection with Bairagania P.S.Case No. 145 of 2016, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U