Shashi Kumar And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14620 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-19 Year-2017 Thana- ANTI District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

SHASHI KUMAR Son of Shri Shiv Shankar Das R/o Village- Khabaspur , P.S.- Aanti, Distt.- Gaya 2.

Niranjan Das @ Gyan Ranjan Kumar @ Gora Son of Shri Shiv Shankar Das R/o village- Khabaspur , P.S- Aanti, Dist.- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Arun Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Narsingh Tanti ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 17-05-2019 This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Aanti P.S. Case No. 19 of 2017, disclosing offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 325, 427, 307, 302, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against petitioner no. 1 is of assault to the deceased and allegation against petitioner no. 2 is of assault to Sunita Devi.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that they have falsely been roped in the present case and though there is allegation against petitioner no. 2 of assaulting Sunita Devi, however, no injury was found on her person and the occurrence took place due to family dispute between the parties.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14620 of 2019(4) dt.17-05-2019 2/2 Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances, so far petitioner no. 2 is concerned, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks, he is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, in connection with Aanti P.S. Case No. 19 of 2017, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. So far petitioner no. 1 is concerned, I am not inclined to grant him the privilege of anticipatory bail. He, if so desire may move before the court below for grant of regular bail, which will be disposed of by the court below on the merit of the case.

This application is, accordingly, disposed of. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunilkumar/- U T