← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/6703/2021withdrawn

Anup Ram v. The State Of Bihar

2022-01-28Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh,Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6703 of 2021 ====================================================== Anup Ram Son of Balkishun Ram Resident of Village - Dubey Belwan, P.O. - Baghi Bazar, P.S. - Kateya, District - Gopalganj. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Food and Consumer Protection Department, Bihar, Patna 2.

The District Magistrate, Gopalganj. Gopalganj 3.

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Hathuwa.

4.

The District Transport Officer, Gopalganj.

5.

The District Co-operative Officer, Gopalganj. 6.

The District Supply Officer, Gopalganj 7.

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Gopalganj.

8.

Manoj Kumar Son of Swaminath Rai Resident of Village - Pathkauli, P.S. - Kateya, District- Gopalganj ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajay Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Lalit Kishore (AG) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH) 28-01-2022 The matter has been taken up for online hearing through video conference because of COVID-19 pandemic restrictions.

The petitioner has put to challenge selection of respondent No. 8 for grant of licence to run a fair price shop under Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2016.

Patna High Court CWJC No.6703 of 2021(2) dt.28-01-2022 2/2 It is the petitioner's case that he has better claim in terms of merit for the purpose of grant of licence than respondent No. 8.

After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application so as to avail remedy under the provisions of the said Control Order, 2016 challenging the selection in question.

This application is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as sought for. If the petitioner makes an application/ representation in this regard within four weeks from today, the Court expects that the same shall be considered in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible. (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) ( Madhuresh Prasad, J) Rajesh/- U