Raunak Kumar @ Rounak Kumar @ Ronak Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16571 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-303 Year-2019 Thana- PARBATTA District- Khagaria ====================================================== 1.
RAUNAK KUMAR @ ROUNAK KUMAR @ RONAK KUMAR, S/o Awdhesh Kumar Singh @ Abdhesh Prasad Singh @ Awdhesh Singh, 2.
Avadhesh Kumar Singh @ Abdhesh Prasad Singh @ Awdhesh Singh, S/o Late Subodh Singh, 3.
Rekha Devi, W/o Avadhesh Kumar Singh @ Abdhesh Prasad Singh @ Awdhesh Singh, All are Residents of Village- Patala, P.S.- Maheshkhut, Distt- Khagaria. ... ... Petitioners
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Jai Shanker Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Rabindra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 18-01-2021 Heard the parties.
The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 363, 366/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Prosecution case in brief is that the informant has filed a written petition before the SHO, Parbatta alleging therein that on 24.02.2019 the sister-in-law of the informant was kidnapped by Raushan Kumar who is a co-villager and for this one case was registered in Maheshkhunt P.S. Later on she was recovered by the police. On 23.07.2019 the sister-in-law Chunni Devi of the informant alongwith her two daughters Mushkan Kumari aged about 16 years and Annu Kumari aged about 11 years came to Aguwani village. On 26.07.2019 at about 3.00 in
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16571 of 2020(8) dt.18-01-2021 2/2 the morning accused persons came in the Bolero car with the common intention to kidnap Chunni Devi and her two daughters kidnapped them. The informant alongwith her family members tried to search them but could not find them. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case.
Learned counsel for the informant submits that the process under Sections 82 and 83 of the Cr.P.C. has already initiated, therefore, this present anticipatory bail application is not maintainable.
Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioners.
In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected in connection with Parbatta P.S. Case No. 303 of 2019 from the Court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-1, Khagaria. Accordingly, the application is dismissed.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) amitkumar/- U T