Sandeep Kumar @ Sandip Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8622 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-16 Year-2019 Thana- JEHANABAD COMPLAINT CASE District- Jehanabad ====================================================== SANDEEP KUMAR @ SANDIP KUMAR Son of Ramjanm Ram Resident of Village - Shastri Nagar Ahari, P.S.- Town, Dist.- Aurangabad. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Minni Kumari D/o Sunil Paswan Resident of Village - Pyarechak, P.S.- Arwal , Dist.- Arwal ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr.Ashok Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State :

Mr.Parmanand Kumar, APP For opposite party No.2 :

Mr.Arvind Kumar Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 06-09-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party No.2 through virtual mode.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaint case No.16/2019 registered under Sections 323, 324, 380, 498A, 504 of the Indian Penal Code, but cognizance has been taken under Sections 498A, 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8622 of 2020(3) dt.06-09-2021 2/3 there is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182. On behalf of the State and learned counsel for the opposite party No.2, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the complaint case/F.I.R.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on his personal bond to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Arwal in connection with Complaint case No.16/2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Once the normalcy is restored, the petitioner shall furnish bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each within a period of eight weeks to the satisfaction of the court concerned in connection with the aforesaid case.

If so advised, either of the parties will be at liberty to

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8622 of 2020(3) dt.06-09-2021 3/3 make an application before the Court below for referring the matter to the District Mediation Centre for the purpose of reconciliation or one time settlement. In case, any such application is made by either of the parties, the court below shall refer the matter to the District Mediation Centre. (Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T