Md. Guddu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10379 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-385 Year-2021 Thana- KHAIRA District- Saran ====================================================== MD. GUDDU Son of Md. Kalam Resident of Village- Khaira, P.O. and P.S.- Khaira, District- Saran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Praveen Prabhakar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ajit Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 19-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in a case registered under sections 489A, 489B, 489C, 489D and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per the prosecution case, on a raid being conducted, counterfeit notes of the value of Rs.74,000/ was recovered from the almirah in the house of the petitioner.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. Even accepting the allegation of recovery/seizure from the house in question, from which the alleged recovery was made, belongs to the joint family. There was dispute with respect to motorcycle of the petitioner with the police which led to the petitioner's false implication in the case. The petitioner is in custody since

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10379 of 2022(5) dt.19-12-2022 2/2 7.11.2021.

A report of the F.S.L. dated 25.8.2022 has been received according to which the currency note seized from the accused persons including the petitioner herein, on examination, have been found to be counterfeit.

Heard learned A.P.P. for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the nature of allegation together with the contents of the report of the F.S.L. according to which the notes recovered from the almirah in the house of the petitioner were found to be counterfeit, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and the application is rejected. Learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial. (Partha Sarthy, J) Saurabh/- U T