Patna High CourtCR. MISC./2509/2017bail granted

Randhir Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

2017-01-30Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2509 of 2017 (2) dt.30-01-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.2509 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -180 Year- 2016 Thana -MALSALAMI District- PATNA ====================================================== Randhir Thakur S/o Late Sukhdeo Thakur R/o Bankahat, Hanumanchak P.S.-Didarganj Distt. Patna .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nityanand Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Rana Randhir Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 30-01-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Malsalami P.S. Case No. 180 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 399, 402 of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 25(1b)A, 26/35 of the Arms At and Sections 20 and 22 of N.D.P.S. Act.

Allegedly, one country made pistol and four live cartridges have been recovered from possession of the petitioner. Submission is of false implication and that the petitioner is in custody since 07.07.2016. He has got criminal antecedent but he is on bail in all the four cases, the Police has got implicated the petitioner in all the cases without any basis and as such he deserves sympathetic consideration.

Learned APP opposes the prayer of bail.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2509 of 2017 (2) dt.30-01-2017 In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering the period of detention, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge X, Patna in connection with Malsalami P.S. Case No. 180 of 2016 (Spl. Case No. 38 of 2016), subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T