Vikash Kumar Jha @Vikash Jha@ Vikash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15043 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-53 Year-2020 Thana- KATRA District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== VIKASH KUMAR JHA @VIKASH JHA@ VIKASH KUMAR SON OF JIWENDRA JHA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE YAJUAR WEST, P.S. KATRA, DISTRICT- MUZAFFARPUR ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ravi Ranjan, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sunil Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 14-11-2022 Heard the parties.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defects within four weeks.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable u/s 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 325, 307, 354(B), 379, 447, 504, 506 of the IPC.

Allegation against the petitioner is that he along with other accused persons have indiscriminately assaulted the informant's side by means of various deadly weapons. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation leveled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. From the impugned order, it is clear that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15043 of 2022(2) dt.14-11-2022 2/2 there is no mention of the injury of Dayanath Jha and the informant. One injury of Sidhinath Jha has been mentioned as grievous in nature but the same has not been inflicted by the petitioner and injury of Taraknath Jha being simple in nature has also not been inflicted by the petitioner. There is no specific allegation against the petitioner to assault Sidhinath Jha and Taraknath Jha. Petitioner has one criminal antecedent. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, since there is no specific allegation that the injuries upon the injured has been inflicted by the petitioner, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Katra P.S. Case No.53 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) pallavi/- U T