Sanjeev Kumar @ Sanjeev Kumar Gupta v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6507 of 2017 (2) dt.10-02-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.6507 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -200 Year- 2016 Thana -GAURICHAK District- PATNA ====================================================== Sanjeev Kumar @ Sanjeev Kumar Guptam son of late Rama Rai,r/o. Gurhutta, Ashok Chakra Gali P.S. Khajekallan, Dist Patna. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner : Mr. Tilak Sao, Adv For the Opposite Party : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 10-02-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 05.09.2016 in connection with Gaurichak P.S. Case No. 200 of 2016 for the alleged offences under Sections 386, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 20(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and it is denied that the petitioner has impersonated anyone. Apart from one mobile phone no incriminating articles has been recovered from his possession. Similarly situated co-accused Sunny Kumar, Lallan Prasad @ Lalan Prasad Sah and Sunil Kant Lohani @ Sunil Lohani @ Sunil Kumar have been granted bail by this Court.

4. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6507 of 2017 (2) dt.10-02-2017 released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Anant Kumar, learned J.M. Ist Class, Patna City, in connection with Gaurichak P.S. Case No. 200 of 2016 on the following conditions - (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii)That the petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(iv) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/BT U T