Birbal Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13596 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-260 Year-2023 Thana- ITARHI District- Buxar ====================================================== 1.

Birbal Ram SON OF RAM NARAYAN RAM Village-Haqimpur, P.S-.Itarhi, District-Buxar 2.

PRIYANSHU RAM @ PRINSU KUMAR SON OF BIRBAL RAM VillageHaqimpur, P.S-.Itarhi, District-Buxar 3.

MANTU RAM @ MANTU KUMAR RAM SON OF ARUN RAM VillageHaqimpur, P.S-.Itarhi, District-Buxar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Abhay Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 12-03-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehends their arrest in connection with Itarhi P.S. Case No. 260 of 2023, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 147, 149, 504, 506, 308, 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per allegation, the petitioner along with other co-accused person came near the house of the informant and started abusing and assaulting him by fists, slap, lathi and brick bat due to which the informant suffered a cut injury on his chest.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that both the parties are neighbor. There is a case and counter

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13596 of 2024(2) dt.12-03-2024 2/2 case. The title suit filed by the father of the informant has been dismissed. He further submitted that the petitioners are the person of clean antecedent and the injuries suffered are simple in nature. He has also submitted that the allegation against the petitioner no. 1 and 2 are general and omnibus. So far as petitioner no. 3 is concerned there is allegation that he assaulted the informant with brick bat on his chest but there is no injury on the chest.

5. Learned APP has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.

6. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, in the event of their arrest or surrender within four weeks before the learned court below, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar in connection with Itarhi P.S. Case No. 260 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) Sudha/- U T