Aman Kumar Das @ Aman Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10496 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-186 Year-2024 Thana- CHACKMEHSI District- Samastipur ====================================================== Aman Kumar Das @ Aman Kumar S/o Arun Das R/o village - Chakmehsi , Police Station - Chakmehsi , District - Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Mukesh Kumar-1 For the Informant Mr. Ranjan Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Madan Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH ORAL ORDER 12-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection Chakmehsi P.S. Case No. 186 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under sections 137(2), 96, 3(5) of the BNS, 2023.
3. As per allegation in the FIR, on the alleged date of occurrence, minor daughter/victim girl of the informant went to purchase some house hold articles from a nearby shop, in the meanwhile four FIR named accused persons including this petitioner with a common intention to kidnap her daughter, accused Chandan Kumar took the victim girl
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10496 of 2025(3) dt.12-05-2025 2/3 on a motorcycle. With the help of villagers, petitioner was caught and three accused managed to escape and later on handed over to the police and thereafter the present FIR.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. Statement of the victim girl has been recorded u/s 183 of the BNSS in which she deposed that due to quarrel between her parents she left her house at her own sweet will and went to her friend Radhika's house for ten days. She blamed her mother that she used to scold her. In her entire statement, nowhere she has taken the name of the petitioner for any offence. Moreover, petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 23.11.2024.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant and submit that victim girl has given her statement u/s 183 of the BNSS under coercion of the petitioner but later on she retracted from her statement.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10496 of 2025(3) dt.12-05-2025 3/3 named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Samastipur in connection with Chakmehsi P.S. Case No. 186 of 2024. (S. B. Pd. Singh, J) sushma/- U