Patna High CourtCR. MISC./55849/2015bail granted

Ranjan Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

2016-02-10Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.55849 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -194 Year- 2015 Thana -KHARAGPUR District- MUNGER ====================================================== Ranjan Sharma son of Rupan Sharma, Resident of village- Gonai, Police Station- Haveli Kharagpur, District - Munger. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md. Harun Quareshi, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Asha Kumari (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 10-02-2016 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case for the offences punishable under sections 25(1-A) and 26 of the Arms Act. Allegedly, from the room of the petitioner, two country made katta and two country made gun were recovered. Submission is of false implication and that the house from where the alleged recovery has been shown is not exclusive property of the petitioner, some of the fire arm recovered have not been found in workable condition and as such the petitioner, who is in custody since 8.8.2015 deserves sympathetic consideration to which the learned A.P.P. opposes by fairly submitting that now the petitioner has remained in custody for more than six months.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.55849 of 2015 (3) dt.10-02-2016 2/2 In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Munger in connection with Kharagpur P.S. Case No.194 of 2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) N.H./- U T