Bittu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9205 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-690 Year-2018 Thana- PATRAKARNAGAR District- Patna ====================================================== Bittu Kumar, aged about 19 years, Son of Shayam Sundar Sahani @ Shyam Sundar Prasad, Resident of Village / Mohalla- Malahi Pakadi, P.S. Kankerbagh, District, Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Manish Kumar No2 For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shyam Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 07-03-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 20, 22, 24 of the N.D.P.S. Act. Allegation against the petitioner is recovery of 15 purias of Brown Sugar each containing 01 gram from his possession.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. It has further been submitted that recovered brown sugar is very less than the commercial quantity. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 23.11.2018. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9205 of 2019(2) dt.07-03-2019 2/2 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Special Case (NDPS) No.135 of 2018 arising out of Patrakar Nagar P.S. Case No.690 of 2018, with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U T