← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/3008/2019disposed

M/S Recon, Through Its Proprietor Prabhat Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-07-09Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3008 of 2019 ====================================================== M/s RECON, through Its Proprietor Prabhat Kumar, Son of Suryadev Singh, Resident of Sudha Sadan, West of Gandhi Murti, Dujra, Police StationBuddha Colony, District-Patna ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Industrial Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 2.

The Managing Director, Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority, Government of Bihar, patna 3.

The Secretary, Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority, Government of Bihar, Patna 4.

The Chief Engineer, Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority, Government of Bihar, Patna 5.

The Assistant Engineer, Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority, Government of Bihar, Patna 6.

The Executive Engineer Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority, Government of Bihar, Patna ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Arbind Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Kinkar Kumar (Sc9) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 09-07-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority (in short 'BIADA').

A counter affidavit has been filed today on behalf of the BIADA, however, in course of argument learned counsel for BIADA has submitted before this Court that because earlier a reasoned order on the request of the petitioner seeking extension of time and the grievances raised by him was not passed and communicated to the petitioner, the competent authority of

Patna High Court CWJC No.3008 of 2019(3) dt.09-07-2019 2/2 BIADA is ready to consider and disposed off the representations of the petitioner as contained in Annexure '8' series to the writ application.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in case the competent authority of BIADA is ready to consider his representations as contained in Annexure '8' series to the writ application and pass a reasoned order thereon, he would not press this writ application at this stage.

In the given facts and circumstances of the case, the writ application is being disposed off with a direction to the Managing Director, BIADA to look into the grievance of the petitioner as contained in Annexure '8' series to the writ application and pass a reasoned order thereon within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. The reasoned order shall be communicated to the petitioner within next 15 days from the date of passing of the order.

This writ application stands disposed off accordingly. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) ved/vats U