Govind Pandey v. The State Of Bihar Through Principal Secretary, Cooperative Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna And O

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.103 of 2016 ======================================================

1. Govind Pandey S/o Madan Mohan Pandey, R/o Village + P.O.- Mangalpur, P.S.- Laukariya (Pathakhauli OP), District- West Champaran .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Cooperative Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

2. Registrar Cooperative Society, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

3. The District Magistrate, West Champaran, Bettiah

4. District Cooperative Officer, West Champaran, Bettiah

5. Block Cooperative Extension Officer, Block Bagaha-2, West Champaran, Bettiah

6. Manager, Manibhusan Mishra, PACS Mangalpur Ausani, Bagaha-2, District- West Champaran, Bettiah

7. The Managing Director, National Central Cooperative Bank, West Champaran, Bettiah

8. The Branch Manager, National Cooperative Society, Bagaha Branch, West Champaran, Bettiha

9. The Chairman, Shashi Bhushan Mishra, PACS, Mangalpur Ausani, Bagaha- 2, District West Champaran, Bettiah .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/ : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey For the State : Mr. Arun Kumar, AC to GP 1 For the Bank : Mr. P. K. Verma, Senior Advocate Mr. Suman Kunar Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-08-2016 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the Bank and the respondents-State of Bihar.

This application has been filed, seeking quashing of the First Information Report of Bagaha Police Station Case No. 493 of 2015, registered for the offences

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.103 of 2016 (8) dt.09-08-2016 2/2 punishable under Sections 409/120B read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

After some argument, learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to approach this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advised, and also to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible. No objection has been raised to the prayer for withdrawal made by the petitioner.

This application is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advised, and also to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J.) Prabhakar Anand/- U √ T √