Sujeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8994 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-348 Year-2024 Thana- NARHATT District- Nawada ====================================================== Sujeet Kumar Son of Bhola shankar prasad Resident of Village- Gangati, P.S. -Narhat, District Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Tribhuwan Narayan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Madhura Nand Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 06-03-2025 Heard Mr. Tribhuwan Narayan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Madhura Nand Jha, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Narhat P.S. Case No. 348 of 2024, F.I.R. dated 03.10.2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 75(2), 78, 352, 351(2) of the B.N.S.

3. Allegation against the petitioner is of assaulting, abusing, wrong behavior and threatening also.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has clean antecedent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R. is false and fabricated and the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R..

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8994 of 2025(2) dt.06-03-2025 2/3 In fact, the petitioner has taken admission in the Coaching in question and after some time he is seeking refund of the Coaching fees and the informant has not returned the same and she has filed the present F.I.R. against the petitioner. He further submits that it appears from the F.I.R. that there is no allegation that he has sexually abused/assault to the informant.

5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the petitioner having clean antecedent and it appears from the F.I.R. that there is no such allegation of sexual abuse/assault against the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Nawada in connection with Narhat P.S. Case No. 348 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure/ Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023 and with other following conditions :-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8994 of 2025(2) dt.06-03-2025 3/3

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witness, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(3) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Ibrar//- U T