Binod Kumar Yadav @ Vinod Yadav @ Vinod Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19941 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-27 Year-2020 Thana- KALER District- Jehanabad ====================================================== BINOD KUMAR YADAV @ VINOD YADAV @ VINOD KUMAR YADAV Son of Rammurat Yadav Resident of Village- Rakhauli, P.S.- Mungra Badshahpur, District- Jaunpur, State- Uttar Pradesh ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.N.K. Agarwal, Sr. Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Humayou Ahmad Khan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 09-05-2022 Heard learned senior counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with N.D.P.S. Case No. 08 of 2020, arising out of Kaler P.S. Case No. 27 of 2020 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 8, 20(b)(ii)c, 25 and 39 of the N.D.P.S. Act.

Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 01.07.2020, is a person with clean antecedent, charge-sheet has been submitted in the case and the allegation is of recovery of 290 kg of ganza from a container as detailed in the F.I.R. and the petitioner, who is the owner of the container, was apprehended along with two unknown accused persons.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19941 of 2021(4) dt.09-05-2022 2/2 Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case as nothing was recovered from the container.

Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that the alleged recovery is of commercial quantity of ganja.

Considering the submissions made by the learned A.P.P. for the State that the alleged recovery is much more than the commercial quantity, the Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. His prayer for bail is thus rejected. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishi/- U T