← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./13726/2025dismissed

Ramkrishna Sah @ Ramkrishna Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-03-10Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13726 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-199 Year-2021 Thana- BELA District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Ramkrishna Sah @ Ramkrishna Kumar Son of Nandlal Sah R/O-Village -Laxmipur , Ward No-02,P.S-Bela, District -Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Mahesh Sah Son of Pragash Sah Resident of Lakshmipur, P.S.- Bela, Distt.- Sitamarhi ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Devendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Syed Mojibur Rahman ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 10-03-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Bela P.S. Case No. 199 of 2021 registered for offences under Sections 341, 323,376, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is alleged to have committed rape upon the victim. There is direct allegation against the petitioner.

4. Considering the nature and the gravity of the offence and also the direct allegation of committing rape against the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in the present case.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13726 of 2025(8) dt.10-03-2026 2/2

5. Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail is hereby rejected.

6. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today and seek regular bail, failing which the Superintendent of Police, Sitamarhi will take all steps for the arrest of the petitioner.

7. It is, however, clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the adjudication of the present application and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner at any subsequent stage of the proceedings.

8. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the Superintendent of Police, Sitamarhi through FAX for its compliance forthwith.

9. Interim order dated 26.11.2025 is hereby vacated.

10. If the DNA test goes in favour of the petitioner, appropriate order shall be passed by the Court below in the regular bail in accordance with law.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Shishir/- U T