Jay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11283 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-243 Year-2020 Thana- LAXMIPUR District- Jamui ====================================================== JAY KUMAR Son of Shri Rameshwar Sah Resident of Village - Ram Chandrapur, P.s.- Jamalpur, Distt.- Munger.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Amrendra Kumar, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ajay Mishra, APP For the Vigilance :

Mr. Arvind Kumar, Adv ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 08-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the Vigilance and learned APP for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within four weeks of resumption of normal court proceedings. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within stipulated period, office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 467, 468, 471, 420, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.

The allegation against the petitioner is that he got appointment as Panchayat Teacher on the basis of forged

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11283 of 2022(3) dt.08-08-2022 2/3 certificate.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation leveled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. The petitioner himself was cheated by Board of Secondary Education. At the time of appointment all the documents were verified and all the documents were found to be true and genuine by the concerned authorities. He further submits that the petitioner has already been dismissed from his service. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent, as also mentioned in para-3 of the bail application.

Learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the Vigilance opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, since the petitioner has already been dismissed from his service, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11283 of 2022(3) dt.08-08-2022 3/3 learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Laxmipur P.S. Case No.243/2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U T