Santosh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1810 of 2016 =========================================================== Santosh Kumar S/o Late Gurudayal Singh resident of Village - Laharabad, P.O. - Laharabad, P.S. Piro, District Bhojpur.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.

3. The Special Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.

4. The Director, Higher Education, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna. .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Bipin Bihari Singh, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Purnendu Singh, G.P.27 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 19-05-2016 Heard counsel for the petitioner and the State. Writ application is required to be dismissed for two reasons, one that merely because the petitioner happens to be the son of a donor, he does not acquire any vested right under any law or rule which makes him entitled to delve into the affairs of working of the college in question. Sentiments have no role to play in the administration of public bodies.

The other ground is what has been stated by a Division Bench in Nagendra Sharma's case annexed as Annexure-A, dated 04.07.2011. Writ is dismissed.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.) SanjayKumar/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 20.05.2016 Transmission Date