Suraj Uraon v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1902 of 2017 (2) dt.20-01-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.1902 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -368 Year- 2016 Thana -PURNEA SADAR District- PURNIA ====================================================== Suraj Uraon, son of Visheshar Uraon.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vijay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Surendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 20-01-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner is accused in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No. 368 of 2016 registered under Sections 379, 461 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code.
Regarding theft of two motorcycles from the campus of informant, he lodged the present case raising suspicion against one Jitendra Oraon having hand in the theft of motorcycles. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in course of investigation, police got recorded the confessional statement of co-accused, Jitendra Oraon, who confessed his guilt about committing theft of two motorcycles of informant and also saying that one motorcycle is kept at the house of the petitioner and other in the house of Rajesh Oraon. Thereafter, one
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1902 of 2017 (2) dt.20-01-2017 motorcycle is said to be recovered near the hut of the petitioner. It is further submitted that, in fact, petitioner is inimical term with the informant due to that reason he has falsely been implicated in this case with ulterior motive. It is further submitted that the informant has filed compromise petition in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea. Further submission is that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 25.09.2016. Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea, in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No. 368 of 2016. Out of two sureties, one surety must be the close relative of the petitioner.
(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Bhardwaj/- U T