Vijay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.25593 of 2013 ====================================================== Vijay Kumar S/O Sri Dineshwar Sah Resident Of Village- Bajitpur, P.SSarairanjan, District- Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary Human Resources Development Department, Govt. Of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna-1

2. The Director, Primary Education, Govt. Of Bihar New Secretariat, Patna-1

3. The Member, District Teachers Employment Appellate Tribunal, Samastipur.

4. The District Magistrate, Samastipur.

5. The District Programme Officer ( Establishment) Samastipur.

6. The District Education Officer, Samastipur.

7. The Block Development Officer, Sarairanjan Block, Samastipur.

8. The Block Education Officer, Sarairanjan Block, Samastipur.

9. The Mukhiya- Cum- Chairman, Panchayat Teachers Selection Committee Gram Panchayat Raj Bhagwatpur P.S And Block Sarairanjan, DistrictSamastipur.

10. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj Bhagwatpur, P.S And Block Sarairanjan, District- Samastipur.

11. The Headmaster Govt. Primary School Harilochanpur P.S And Block Sarairanjan, District- Samastipur.

12. Pratima Kumari W/O Sri Gagan Kumar Mishra Resident Of Village Harilochanpur, P.S- Sarairanjan District Samastipur, At Present Posted As Panchayat Teacher In Govt. Primary School Harilochanpur, P.S And Block Sarairanjan, District- Samastipur.

13. Mina Kumari W/O Sri Mahesh Jha And D/O Sri Bishwanath Chaudhary Resident Of Village- Harilochanpur, P.S- Sarairanjan, District- Samastipur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pawan Kumar Chaurasia, Advocate, For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Kumar Kamalnayan, AC to SC-28 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 14-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present writ petition was filed against the decision of District Teachers Employment Appellate Tribunal, Samastipur,

Patna High Court CWJC No.25593 of 2013(2) dt.14-09-2018 2/2 contained an Annexure-12. He submits that now the State Appellate Authority is available against the decision of the District Teachers Employment Appellate Tribunal as Appellate forum and as such petitioner may be granted liberty to approach the State Appellate Authority.

In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner, in case such appeal is filed by the petitioner within a period of one month from today along with copy of this order, the Appellate Authority will condone the delay in filing the appeal and entertain and decide expeditiously the same on its own merits in view of the pendency of the writ petition for last more than four years.

With the aforesaid the writ petition stands disposed of. (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) T.Kr./- U