Patna High CourtCR. MISC./5089/2017bail granted

Md. Shakeel @ Md. Safil v. The State Of Bihar

2017-02-17Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.5089 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -65 Year- 2016 Thana -BHIMPUR District- SUPAUL ======================================================

1. Md. Shakeel @ Md. Safil, Son of Md. Hasan @ Hasnu @ Vatru, resident of Village & Police Station- Narpatganj, District- Araria. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arun For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Nirmal Kumar Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 17-02-2017 Heard the parties.

This application has been filed in connection with Bhimpur P.S.Case No.65 of 2016 for the offence under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner is in custody for about five months and the charges has been framed against this petitioner but against this petitioner there is nothing except the confessional statement of another coaccused, in which he has named this petitioner also. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides. In view of the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5089 of 2017 (3) dt.17-02-2017 2/2 the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Sunil Kumar, J.M., Supaul in connection with Bhimpur P.S.Case No.65 of 2016. With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U