Satish Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.5098 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -505 Year- 2016 Thana -MADHEPURA District- MADHEPURA ======================================================
1. Satish Kumar Yadav, son of Late Deobrat Yadav, Resident of VillageAzad Nagar, Ward No.7, Police Station- Madhepura, District- Madhepura. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Uday Chand Prasad Mr. Manoj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 15-02-2017 Heard the parties.
This application has been filed in connection with Madhepura P.S.Case No.505 of 2016 for the offence under Sections 47(A) of the Bihar Excise Amendment Act, 2016. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that 07 ltrs. of foreign liquor have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner, however, the petitioner has clean antecedent and he has remained in custody for about three months.
Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides. In view of the period of custody of the petitioner as well as the fact that the petitioner has clean antecedent, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5098 of 2017 (2) dt.15-02-2017 2/2 two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Madhepura in connection with Madhepura Police Station Case No.505 of 2016.
With following conditions :
(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.
With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U