Patna High CourtCWJC/15616/2016disposed

The Managing Committee Of Madarsa Adle Ittehadul Muslemeen v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-12-16Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15616 of 2016 =========================================================== The Managing Committee of Madarsa Adle Ittehadul Muslemeen at village Dubiyahi, P.O. Lalpur, District Supaul through it's Secretary Md. Shafeeque. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary Human Resources Development Department, Bihar, Patna.

2. Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Bihar, Patna.

3. Special Director, Secondary Education, Bihar, Patna.

4. District Education Officer, Supaul.

5. Bihar State Madarsa Education Board through it's Secretary, 5, Vidyapati Marg, Patna - 1.

6. The Chairman, Bihar State Madarsa Education Board, 5 Vidyapati Marg, Patna - 1.

7. The Secretary, Bihar State Madarsa Education Board, 5 Vidyapati Marg, Patna - 1.

8. Md. Qamurddin son of Md. Nathuni Mian resident of village - Dubiyahi, District - Supaul, so called Secretary of Madarsa Adle Ittehadul Muslemeen at Dubiyahi, District - Supaul.

9. Abdul Mannan son of not known So Called President of the Madarsa Adle Ittehadul Muslemeen, at Dubiyahi, District - Supaul. .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Obaidur Rahman, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Madanjeet Singh, GP20 For Madarsa Board :

Mr. Rashid Alam, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 16-12-2016 Objection of the counsel for Madarsa Board is correct. No cause of action as of now has arisen though it is another thing that delay is surely causing anxiety to the petitioner.

Patna High Court CWJC No.15616 of 2016 dt.16-12-2016 2 / 2

2. It will be in the interest of things that the District Education Officer, Supaul completes the enquiry and submits a report within a reasonable time, since more than four years have now gone past since Annexure-6 was issued by the then District Education Officer, Supaul. The Court fixes outer time frame of three months. Writ stands disposed of.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.) S.Kumar/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 19.12.2016 Transmission Date NA