Nand Kishore Rai @ Nand Kishore Yadav @ Jangali v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9619 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-97 Year-2017 Thana- EAST CHAMPARAN COMPLAINT District- East Champaran ====================================================== NAND KISHORE RAI @ NAND KISHORE YADAV @ JANGALI Son of Singhasan Yadav Resident of Village - Sobaiyan, P.S.- Kotwa, District- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Lalmati Devi Wife of Nand Kishor Rai @ Nand Kishore Yadav @ Jangali, D/O - Rambabu Yadav Resident of Village - Pokhra, P.S.- Kotwa, DsitrictEast Champaran ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Vijay Shankar Shrivastava For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Anil Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 28-08-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State assisted by learned counsel for the opposite party no.2.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498A, 307, 323, 504, 506 and 494/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. The petitioner in association of other co-accused is said to have assaulted and mentally tortured her and they also sprinkled kerosene oil and tried to set her ablaze on nonfulfillment of demand dowry.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9619 of 2020(4) dt.28-08-2023 2/2 no such occurrence as alleged ever took place. He has been falsely implicated in this case only with a view to harass him. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. It is further stated that the opposite party no.2 is living in the house of the petitioner with full honour and dignity. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.
5. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail.
6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case as also the statement made in para-7 of this application, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Complaint Case No. C-97 of 2017, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Trivedi/- U T