Vikash Kumar Singh And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.4674 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -276 Year- 2016 Thana -DUMRAUN District- BUXAR ======================================================

1. Vikash Kumar Singh

2. Kailash Kumar Singh @ Kailash Singh.

Both Sons of Ram Sursh Singh, Resident of Village- Purna Bhojpur, P.S.- Dumraon, District- Buxar.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bachan Jee Ojha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Dr.Mrityunjaya Kr.Gautam, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 14-02-2017 This is an application for grant of bail for offences punishable under Sections 324, 326, 307, 354, 457, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners they have falsely been implicated in this case. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners. No specific allegation has been alleged against them. It has also been submitted that they have assaulted with chhura but injury on the body of Rahul Kumar appears to be simple in nature. Injury on the mother of Rahul Kumar appears to be serious but it has not been attributed to any of the accused persons. They are in custody for four months. Heard learned A.P.P. also. He has opposed the prayer

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.4674 of 2017 (2) dt.14-02-2017 2/2 for bail and has submitted that injury caused to the mother of Rahul Kumar is serious in nature. As such, petitioners do not deserve bail.

Having heard both sides, in view of the submission made above, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners, the same is rejected. However, trial court, i.e., learned A.D.J.-I, Buxar, is directed to expedite trial in connection with Dumraon P. S. Case no. 276 of 2016 (POCSO Act) ( Naya Bhojpur O.P.) and conclude the same preferably within a period of six months from today. If trial is not concluded within the stipulated period, petitioners are at liberty to renew their prayer for bail. With the aforesaid observation, the present application stands disposed of.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sudip/- U T