Patna High CourtCWJC/2941/2016disposed

Sunita Kumari @ Sunita Devi @ Sunita Dave v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-01-15Mr. Justice Jyoti Saran2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2941 of 2016 ======================================================

1. Sunita Kumari @ Sunita Devi @ Sunita Dave Wife of Sri Ram Paswan Resident of village- Naropatti, P.O- Dihuli Bujurg, P.S. and Block- Sakra, District Muzaffapur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief , Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Social and welfare Department , Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director, Integrated Child Development Service, Bihar, Patna.

4. The District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur, District Muzaffarpur.

5. The District Programme Officer, Muzaffarpur, District Muzaffarpur

6. The Child Development Project Officer, Sakra, District Muzaffarpur.

7. The lady Supervisor, Child Development Project, Sakra, Block Muzaffarpur.

8. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj, Dihuli, Ishak, Block Sakra, DistrictMuzaffarpur.

9. The Ward Member, Ward no. 13, Gram Panchyat Raj, Dihuli, Ishak, Block Sakra, District Muzaffarpur.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vijay Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Gautam Bose, AAG 8 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 15-01-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The grievance of the petitioner is that a selection process initiated on 8.12.2014 for appointment of Anganbari Sevika of Centre No.75, Ward No.13, Gram Panchayat Raj, Dihuli Ishak in the District of Muzaffarpur vide Annexure-1 has not reached its conclusion.

Although a representation is filed before the District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur but under the guidelines the competent authority to examine the matter at the first instance would be the

Patna High Court CWJC No.2941 of 2016 (2) dt.15-01-2018 2/2 District Programme Officer, Muzaffarpur the respondent No.5 herein.

In the circumstances, I deem it proper to dispose of the writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to raise her grievance before the District Programme Officer, Muzaffarpur and it goes without saying that any such representation being filed by the petitioner within fortnight from today shall be considered and disposed of by the District Programme Officer in accordance with law within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order by speaking order.

The writ petition is disposed of.

(Jyoti Saran, J) Bibhash/- U