Mahendra Prasad Chaurasiya v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CIVIL REVIEW No.36 of 2019 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8929 of 2017 ====================================================== Mahendra prasad Chaurasiya, aged about 59 years (M) S/o-Jatahu Prasad Chaurasiya R/o- Ward no. 06, Mahadeo Asthan, Near of Sanskrit Middle School, P.O-Sanjat, P.S.-Bhagwanpur, Dist. Begusarai, Presently posted as the Headmaster Primary-cum- Madhya Sanskrit Vidayalaya Mahadeo Asthan, Sanjat, P.S.-Bhagwanpur, Dist Begusarai ( Respondent no.7 in CWJC No. 8929 of 2017) ... ... Review Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Secretary-cum-Commissioner, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna. 2.

The Additional Secretary, Human Resources Development Department Govt. of Bihar, Patna 3.

The Secretary-Cum-Commissioner Finance Department Govt. of Bihar, Patna 4.

The Special Deputy Director (Incharge Sanskrit Education)Primary Secondary and Adult Education. Govt. of Bihar,Patna 5.

The Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board through the Secretary, East Boring Canal Road, Patna.

6.

The Managing Committee through the Secretary of Primary -Cum- Madhya Sanskrit Vidyalaya Mahadeo Asthan Sanjat, P.S- Bhagwanpur, Dist. Begusarai. ... (Respondents in CWJC No. 8929 of 2017) ... .....Opp. Party 1st set.

7.

Arjun Thakur, aged about 50 years (Male) Son of Late Siya Ram Thakur Resident of Village- Sanjat, P.S.- Bhagwanpur, District- Begusarai. Petitioner in CWJC No. 8929 of 2017) .... ..... Opp Party 2nd set ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr.Brisketu Sharan Pandey, Adv.

For the Opposite Party :

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 02-03-2022 Heard Mr. Brisketu Sharan Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner.

It is submitted that the application has become

Patna High Court C. REV. No.36 of 2019(3) dt.02-03-2022 2/2 infructuous due to events subsequent to filing of the review petition. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press this application.

Accordingly, the application is dismissed as not pressed.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) shyambihari/- U