Nasruddin @ Nasiruddin And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.6151 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -404 Year- 2016 Thana -SIWAN MUFFASIL District- SIWAN ======================================================

1. Nasruddin @ Nasiruddin, son of Kyamuddin,

2. Ajmer Rai, son of Nanher Rai, Both residents of Village- Hathauzi, Police Station- Nautan, District- Siwan.

.... .... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Javed Aslam, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bharat Lal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 02-03-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.

This is an application for bail in connection with Siwan Muffasil P.S.Case No. 404 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 413 and 414 of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that there is allegation against them that they were intercepted by police along with Bolero vehicle but actually the vehicle is of some other person and petitioners are driver and co-driver. It has further been submitted that during course of investigation material has come that the vehicle was purchased by one Rizwanul Haque and they have nothing to do with the owner of the vehicle and they have remained in custody since 3.10.2016.

Heard learned APP also.

Having heard both sides and considering the fact that

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6151 of 2017 (3) dt.02-03-2017 2/2 petitioners are driver and co-driver and the case diary shows that the owner of the vehicle is Rizwanul Haque, let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan, in connection with Siwan Muffasil P.S.Case No. 404 of 2016, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioners will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioners shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make themselves available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on their part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move the cancellation of their bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U