Rakesh Roshan Gupta v. Life Insurance Corporation Of India And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Letters Patent Appeal No.182 of 2016 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 16181 of 2015 ======================================================
1. Rakesh Roshan Gupta S/o Raghunath Prasad Gupta resident of Flat No. 305, C/o Satyam Apartment, Montessori School Lane, Boring Raod, P.S.- S.K. Puri, Distt- Patna.
.... .... Appellant/s
Versus
1. Life Insurance Corporation of India through its Chairman-cumManaging Director, 1st Floor, East Wing, Yogakshema Building, Jeevan Bima Marg, Churchgate, Mumbai.
2. The Zonal Manager, Life Insurance Corporation of India, Exhibition Raod, Patna
3. The Divisional Manager, Life Insurance Corporation of India, Bhagalpur Division, Bhagalpur.
4. The Chief Manager, Life Insurance Corporation of India, Munger Office, Sita Kund Road, Nandlalpur, P.O.- Benigir, Via- Basudeopur, Distt- Munger.
5. The Administrative Officer, (Loan Department) Life Insurance Corporation of India, Munger Branch, Munger.
6. The Chief General Manager, State Bank of India, Local Head Office (L.H.O.), West Gandhi Maidan, Patna.
7. The General Manager, State Bank of India, Local Head Office, West Gandhi Maidan, Patna.
8. The Deputy General Manager, Zonal Office, State Bank of India, Bhagalpur.
9. The Chief Manager, State Bank of India, Munger Main Branch, Munger.
.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar Verma, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Kaushlendra Kumar Sinha, Advocate For respondent Nos.1 to 5: Mr. Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, Advocate Mr. Sudhanshu Trivedi, ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ) 09-03-2016 Heard Mr. Sunil Kumar Verma, learned Counsel for the appellant, and Mr. Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, learned Counsel,
Patna High Court LPA No.182 of 2016 (4) dt.09-03-2016 2/2 appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 5. Heard also Mr. Kaushlendra Kumar Sinha, learned Counsel, appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.6 to 9.
Learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw this appeal with liberty to approach this Court with appropriate application raising the claim for refund of the money, which was kept in hold by the State Bank of India, Main Branch, Munger.
No objection has been raised to the prayer for withdrawal made by the appellant.
In view of the above and in the interest of justice, the appeal is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the appellant to approach this Court with appropriate application raising the claim for refund of the money, which was kept in hold by the State Bank of India, Main Branch, Munger, in future, if so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.
(I.A. Ansari, ACJ) (Anjana Mishra, J) Mkr./- U