Manoj Kumar Yadav @ Manoj Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.57751 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -56 Year- 2015 Thana -KISHUNPUR District- SUPAUL ====================================================== Manoj Kumar Yadav @ Manoj Yadav Son of late Chakardhar Yadav resident of Village -Jhakhrahi, P.S. Kishanpur, District Supaul. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prafull Chandra Thakur, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Binod Kumar, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 25-01-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Kishanpur P.S. Case No. 56 of 2015 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 304(B), 201, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.

The petitioner is the cousin Bhaisur of the deceased and there is no specific allegation against him. It is submitted that the petitioner has got no concern with the deceased or her husband; the deceased went missing and after that information, the informant came and lodged this false case; the other co-accused Upendra Yadav and Shiv Shankar Yadav have already been allowed bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 37932/2015 and the petitioner is suffering in custody since 20.10.2015 and, as such, he also

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.57751 of 2015 (2) dt.25-01-2016 2/2 deserves sympathetic consideration.

Learned A.P.P. fairly submits that the petitioner is the cousin Bhaisur of the deceased.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Supaul in connection with Kishanpur P.S. Case No. 56 of 2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from the privilege of bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) Dilip/- U T