Suresh Sahni @ Fakira Sahni v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.3459 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -92 Year- 2015 Thana -NANHPUR District- SITAMARHI ====================================================== Suresh Sahni @ Fakira Sahni, Son of Chalitar Sahni, Resident of VillageRaipur, P.S. - Nanpur, District - Sitamarhi. .... .... Petitioner.

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Vimal Kumari, D/o Harendra Sahni, wife of Suresh Sahni, At present resident of Village-Raipur, P.S. Nanpur, District- Sitamarhi. .... .... Opposite Parties.

====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr.

For the State : Mr.

For the O.P. No.2 : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER ------------ 13-04-2017 Let the Vakalatnama filed on behalf of the victim/opposite party no.2, the daughter of the informant, be kept on the record.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State as also the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the victim/opposite party no.2, the daughter of the informant.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Nanpur P.S. Case No.92 of 2015 registered under Sections 363 and 366(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The accusation is of kidnapping the victim/opposite party

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3459 of 2017 (3) dt.13-04-2017 2/3 no.2, the minor daughter of the informant, by this petitioner. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that while the victim/opposite party no.2, the minor daughter of the informant, who came in touch of the petitioner after the death of the first wife of the petitioner, under pressure gave her statement under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal procedure stating about her kidnapping by this petitioner but, at present, the victim/opposite party no.2, the minor daughter of the informant, is residing with the petitioner after her release on 01.07.2016 by the court of the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Pupri, Sitamarhi. The petitioner is in custody since 23.06.2016.

Sri Jagdish Prasad, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the victim/opposite party no.2, the daughter of the informant, submits that after her release on 01.07.2016 by the court of the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Pupri, Sitamarhi, the victim/opposite party no2, the daughter of the informant, is residing with the petitioner as wife.

Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Pupri, Sitamarhi, in

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3459 of 2017 (3) dt.13-04-2017 3/3 connection with Nanpur P.S. Case No.92 of 2015. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) P.S./- U T