Alok Ram @ Alok Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10554 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-248 Year-2025 Thana- KESARIA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Alok Ram @ Alok Kumar S/o Shashi Ram @ Satyendra Ram Resident of Village- Rajpur, P.S.- Keshariya, District- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Kundan Rathore @ Kundan Kumar, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mrs. Rina Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 23-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Keshariya P.S. Case No. 248 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 189(2), 126(2), 115(2), 109, 308(2), 352, 351(2), 190 of the B.N.S., 2023.
3. The case of the prosecution in short is that the informant's nephew Rahis and Md. Afsar were surrounded by accused persons including the petitioner and it is alleged that they have assaulted them by means of sticks and iron rod causing injuries to them.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10554 of 2026(2) dt.23-02-2026 2/2 case. He also submits that from perusal of the FIR, it will transpire that the nature of allegation is general and omnibus. There is no specific allegation against anyone. He further submits that similarly situated other co-accused person namely, Kundan Ram has already been granted bail by the learned coordinate bench of this court vide Cr. Misc. No. 61364 of 2025. Moreover, a statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 14.10.2025.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Keshariya P.S. Case No. 248 of 2025. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T