Birendra Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15795 of 2016 ====================================================== Birendra Kumar Yadav, S/o Late Sone Lal Yadav, Resident of VillageKhairamath (Kha), P.O.-Bela, P.S. -Jai Nagar, District-Madhubani, At present, Chairman, PACS, Gram Panchayat Raj-Belhi (South), District-Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Cooperatives, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Co-operatives, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
3. The Principal Secretary, Department of Food and Consumer Protection.
4. The Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Bihar, Patna.
5. The Managing Director, Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation, Patna.
6. The Collector, District-Madhubani.
7. The Sub-Divisional Officer Jai Nagar, District-Madhubani.
8. The District Co-operative Officer, District-Madhubani.
9. The Block Development Officer, Jai Nagar, District-Madhubani.
10. The Block Co-operative Extension Officer, Jai Nagar, District-Madhubani.
11. The Block Supply Officer, Jai Nagar, District-Madhubani. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Jitendra Kumar, Advocate Mr. Madhu Prasun, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Amit Prakash- GA13 Mr. Vikash Kumar, Advocate Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 23-02-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation and learned counsel for the State.
The petitioner not having availed the statutory remedy of appeal, the Court is not inclined to entertain the writ application.
However, in the event, if the petitioner files an appeal
Patna High Court CWJC No.15795 of 2016(2) dt.23-02-2023 2/2 before the Competent Authority within 30 days from today, the Competent Authority shall condone the limitation taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner was availing his remedy before this Court since 17.09.2016.
The writ application is dismissed.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishi2/VikashU