Anubhav Kumar @ Anubhav Kumar Jha v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10163 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-555 Year-2021 Thana- SAKRA District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== ANUBHAV KUMAR @ ANUBHAV KUMAR JHA S/o- Sunil Kumar Jha R/o - Village - Titra Aashanand, P.S. - Sakra, District - Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Niranjan Parihar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 20-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on 09.11.2021 at about 03:40 PM when he along with his younger son had gone to the market and reached near the house of Bal Bodh Jha when petitioner along with other accused persons dragged his son to their door and petitioner assaulted the informant with rod causing injury on his head and thereafter other accused persons also assaulted other family members of the informant as detailed in the F.I.R.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10163 of 2022(3) dt.20-12-2022 2/2 petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case, it is next submitted that even presuming what has been alleged is true without admitting for the purposes of anticipatory bail, then the injury suffered by the informant on account of assault is simple in nature and the blow was not repeated which amply demonstrates that petitioner never had any intention of committing a serious occurrence.

Learned counsel for the informant does not oppose the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner and submits that already a compromise has been arrived at.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Sakra P.S. Case No. 555 of 2021 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T