Ashok Kumar Singh And ANR v. The Union Of India And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14486 of 2018 ====================================================== 1.

Ashok Kumar Singh S/o-Late Deep Narayan Singh, Resident of VillageMakhdumpur, P.O.-Digha Ghat, P.S.-Digha, District-Patna-800011. 2.

Urmila Ray, W/o-Shri Manoj Kumar, Resident of Mohalla-Kurjee, Gate No.-68, P.O.-Sadaquat Ashram, P.S.-Digha, Disrtict-Patna-800010. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Union Of India represented through its Secretary, Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Department, Government of India, Indira Paryavaran Bhawan, Jor Bagh, Lodi Road, New Delhi-110003 2.

The State of Bihar represented through the Principal Secretary, Government of BIhar, Old Secretariat, Patna, Bihar-800015. 3.

The Mines Commissioner-Cum-Principal Secretary, Mines and Geology Department, Government of Bihar, Vikash Bhawan, New Secretariat, Bailey Road, Patna, Bihar-800015.

4.

The District Magistrate, Patna, Bihar-800001. 5.

The District Mining Officer, Patna, Bihar-800001. 6.

The Circle Officer, Patna Sadar, Patna.

7.

The Circle Officer, Block-Danapur, Patna.

8.

The State Environment Impact Assessment Authority, 2nd Floor, Beltron Bhawan, Shashtri Nagar, Bailey Road, Patna.

9.

M/s Brod-Son Commodities Private Limited, Dr, Himanshu Complex, Block Road, Koilwar Chowk, Arah (Bhojpur) ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None.

For the Resp-State :

Mr. Gyan Prakash Ojha, GA-7 For the Resp No.8 :

Smt. Binita Singh, Adv.

Mr. Kumar Ravish, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 25-08-2023 Despite repeated calls, none appears on behalf of the petitioners.

2. Learned counsel for the respondents are present.

3. Earlier, on the last occasion, when the matter was

Patna High Court CWJC No.14486 of 2018(3) dt.25-08-2023 2/2 called out, there was none on behalf of the petitioners to press the application. Thus, it appears that the petitioners are not interested to prosecute this application.

4. Accordingly, it is dismissed for want of prosecution.

(Harish Kumar, J) rohit/- U